|Janet Blanco on Physician-Assisted Suicide|
|Holly Reichow on Physician-Assisted Suicide|
|Holly Reichow on Physician-Assisted Suicide|
|Manateemom on Physician-Assisted Suicide|
|taracosta on PROPAGANDA ALERT ASSIGNMENT|
Just another WordPress.com site
Does the Constitution Forbid the Execution of a Convicted Murderer Who Is “Actually Innocent”?
The ones convicted must have a strong family support and dedication to follow through upon proving their innocence.
As with Day, he states, that even though he was exonerated, people around him (at work) would claim to be uncomfortable with him even though they knew of his innocence. I believe this to be extremely narrow-minded, but a majority of us are this way.
If I were raped, I would most definitely be positive of who the accused was. I wonder what the women that accused and convicted the wrong men are feeling now that they have been proven innocent.
I would agree with Sandra Day O’Connor. I believe that the defendant Leandro Andrade has committed many crimes, felonies and misdemeanors that have led up to these two thefts. He has admitted to his crimes and that he has a drug addiction the causes him to commit crimes once let out of jail. In this case, Andrade should be sent to drug rehab and then possibly looked at for the sentencing.
I am surprised the only jurisdiction where the three strikes law has involved large numbers is in California.
This subject has really touched my heart and has made me think of my life and others in it in full. I have never had to experience this personally, nor have I known anyone close that has to explain the pain and suffering of those around the patient/loved one.
I am only half way through the Nancy Cruzan article and have tears in my eyes for her family. How awful they must have felt. Mr. Cruzan stated that it was like Nancy died the day of the accident and they were just visiting her body. To watch her lay there and remember how strong and independent she was.
I will keep reading the assigned articles and send more of my thoughts. Then check out my other peer’s blog on the topic.
Thank you Dr. Wendel for starting this class off with this subject. I feel that I am going to gain great knowledge from you, this class, and my classmates.
The word “propaganda” has already been used several times, and the reader may wonder how this term is being used. The definition of propaganda has been widely debated, but there is little agreement about what it means. Some argue that all persuasive communication is propagandistic, while others suggest that only dishonest messages can be considered propaganda. Political activists of all stripes claim that they speak the truth while their opponents preach propaganda. In order to accommodate the breadth of the CPI’s activities, this discussion relies on Harold Lasswell’s broad interpretation of the term. “Not bombs nor bread,” wrote Lasswell, “but words, pictures, songs, parades, and many similar devices are the typical means of making propaganda.” According to Lasswell, “propaganda relies on symbols to attain its end: the manipulation of collective attitudes.”
U.S. Senate votes against offshore drilling bill
It wasn’t enough to convince Webb, Warner and other Senate Democrats, who were joined by five Republicans and one independent in opposing the bill. It failed 57 to 42.
Palin Camp Rips Limbaugh, Hits His “Retard” Comment As “Crude And Demeaning”
EMOTIONS and PERSUASION
CPI propaganda typically appealed to the heart, not to the mind. Emotional agitation is a favorite technique of the propagandist, because “any emotion may be ‘drained off’ into any activity by skillful manipulation.” An article which appeared in Scientific Monthly shortly after the war argued that “the detailed suffering of a little girl and her kitten can motivate our hatred against the Germans, arouse our sympathy for Armenians, make us enthusiastic for the Red Cross, or lead us to give money for a home for cats.” Wartime slogans such as “Bleeding Belgium,” “The Criminal Kaiser,” and “Make the World Safe For Democracy,” suggest that the CPI was no stranger to this idea. Evidence of this technique can be seen in a typical propaganda poster that portrayed an aggressive, bayonet-wielding German soldier above the caption “Beat Back The Hun With Liberty Bonds.” In this example, the emotions of hate and fear were redirected toward giving money to the war effort. It is an interesting side-note that many analysts attribute the failure of German propaganda in America to the fact that it emphasized logic over passion. According to Count von Bernstorff, a German diplomat, “the outstanding characteristic of the average American is rather a great, though superficial, sentimentality,” and German press telegrams completely failed to grasp this fact.
APPEALS TO FEAR
Yemen. Bomb. Terror. Threat. Fear. Propaganda.
APPEALS TO HATRED
Killing bin Laden: How the U.S. Finally Got Its Man
APPEALS TO PRIDE
Waging war on women?
A Virginia lawmaker declared that God punishes women who undergo an abortion by giving them disabled children. His reasoning was that nature takes vengeance when a first-born child is aborted citing the Old Testament assertion that the “first born of every being, animal and man was dedicated to the Lord.”
One of the most famous American posters from the war, it shows the iconic “Rosie the Riveter” as an encouragement to the millions of American women who were needed to fill the traditionally male jobs now becoming vacant with the men at war.
The two world wars, especially the second, were important in showing the feasibility of women holding traditionally male jobs. While after both wars, the women employed during the war were “sent back to the kitchen”, in the long term, their crucial contribution to wartime production helped open up a vast amount of new career opportunities.
Nowadays, this poster is still seen as a symbol of feminism and female empowerment.
The Health Care Crisis and What to Do About It
Financial crisis: Good points and bad points of US bail-out
The deal proposed by George W Bush’s administration to rescue the economy from the credit crisis has divided opinion. Here we assess its pros and cons.
INDIANAPOLIS | Overturning a common law dating back to the English Magna Carta of 1215, the Indiana Supreme Court ruled Thursday that Hoosiers have no right to resist unlawful police entry into their homes.
I have opened this blog to post current legal issues for my online class and to interact with my fellow classmates to receive and post comments on my views. Also, to share interesting issues that may arise and I would like to see what the others opinions and facts may be.